US v. SBF: in closing statements, the US relied heavily on evidence to argue SBF is guilty and said he was "greedy" while SBF's defense only made things worse (Elizabeth Lopatto/The Verge)

Elizabeth Lopatto / The Verge:
US v. SBF: in closing statements, the US relied heavily on evidence to argue SBF is guilty and said he was “greedy” while SBF's defense only made things worse  —  Mistakes aren't illegal, but fraud is — and Bankman-Fried's lawyers never made his defense land.

Posted from: this blog via Microsoft Power Automate.

Do your Amazon shopping through this link.